Improving the efficiency of cost-effectiveness analysis to inform policy decisions in the real world: lessons from the Pharmacoeconomics Research Unit at Cancer Care Ontario
نویسنده
چکیده
There are important challenges in the application of cost-effectiveness analysis results in the real world that highlight the great divide between academic research and practical application. The difficulty is magnified in cancer because of the intense emotions it raises and their influence on decision making, impacting treatment funding decisions. Nevertheless, the potential for costeffectiveness analysis to inform policy decisions is also great. In 2007, Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) established Canada’s first in-house Pharmacoeconomics Research Unit comprised of independent researchers. This presentation reviews the initial five years of the Pharmacoeconomics Research Unit at CCO. The purpose is to share lessons and point out directions for future research in cost-effectiveness analysis aimed at informing decision makers in the real world. To enrich the evidence base, we must continue to develop and apply new methods of analyzing data and displaying information. We must also face the reality that the purpose of our role may be to promote goals related to process rather than outcome, suggesting that getting the question of interest right may be more important for researchers than correctly solving the wrong problem. Creating the best estimate of cost-effectiveness is not knowledge for knowledge’s sake; this type of information is the foundation of accountability and sustainability. There is great potential for methods from health economics to provide useful information; it is possible for the results of our analysis to be understood and used by policy makers and other decision makers in the real world. Experiences at the Pharmacoeconomics Research Unit have illustrated this potential.
منابع مشابه
Use of Cost-Effectiveness Data in Priority Setting Decisions: Experiences from the National Guidelines for Heart Diseases in Sweden
Background The inclusion of cost-effectiveness data, as a basis for priority setting rankings, is a distinguishing feature in the formulation of the Swedish national guidelines. Guidelines are generated with the direct intent to influence health policy and support decisions about the efficient allocation of scarce healthcare resources. Certain medical conditions may be given higher priority ran...
متن کاملIncorporating Cost-Effectiveness Data in a Fair Process for Priority Setting Efforts; Comment on “Use of Cost-Effectiveness Data in Priority Setting Decisions: Experiences from the National Guidelines for Heart Diseases in Sweden”
Cost-effectiveness data is useful for use in priority setting decisions in order to improve the efficiency of resources used. This paper thereby responds to Eckard et al. which addressed the use of cost-effectiveness data in the actual prioritization decisions in the Swedish national clinical guidelines for heart diseases. Based on a set of experiences on the use of economic evaluation in prior...
متن کاملHealth Equity in National Cancer Control Plans: An Analysis of the Ontario Cancer Plan
Background National cancer control plans (NCCPs) are important documents that guide strategic priorities in cancer care and plan for the appropriate allocation of resources based on the social, geographic and economic needs of a population. Despite the emphasis on health equity by the World Health Organization (WHO), few NCCPs have ...
متن کاملA Practical Guide for Using Registry Data to Inform Decisions About the Cost Effectiveness of New Cancer Drugs: Lessons Learned from the PHAROS Registry
Decision makers increasingly request evidence on the real-world cost effectiveness of a new treatment. There is, however, a lack of practical guidance on how to conduct an economic evaluation based on registry data and how this evidence can be used in actual decision making. This paper explains the required steps on how to perform a sound economic evaluation using examples from an economic eval...
متن کاملContextual Factors Influencing Cost and Quality Decisions in Health and Care: A Structured Evidence Review and Narrative Synthesis
Background Decisions affecting cost and quality are taken across health and care but investigation of the mediating role of context in these is in its infancy. This paper presents a synthesis of the evidence on the contextual factors that influence ‘decisions of value’ – defined as those characterised by having a significant and demonstrable impact on both quality and resources – in health and ...
متن کامل